USC - IGMAG Exhibit:
Renewing A Lost Order
Jewish Bialystok and Surroundings in
Eastern Poland – by Tomaz Wisniewski
Lesson
Plan
I. Goal: Via exploration of the "Renewing A Lost Order" USC
Institute for Genetic Medicine Art Gallery (IGMAG) exhibit, students will gain
understanding of the concepts of internal and external oppression and how it
relates to their roles as civic leaders, while UP-GRADING their language,
mathematic and creative arts skills.
II.General Objectives:
w
Personal
journals outlined gauging what students knew before the show, what was learned,
what they wish to know/explore in the future
w
Newsletter
created by students
w
Round
table discussion identifying what internal and external oppression means to
each student
w
Individual
presentations
III. Learning Objectives:
▪ Word Analysis,
Fluency, and Systematic Vocabulary Development
Rubric:
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
1. Analysis |
Examples given in
¼ of Expos. writing |
Examples given in 2/4 of Expos.
writing |
Examples given in
¾ of Expos. writing |
Examples given in 4/4 of Expos.
writing |
|
2. Fluency |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
|
3. Voc. Develop. |
¼ of Vocab.
words used correctly |
2/4 of Vocab. words used correctly |
¾ of Vocab.
words used correctly |
4/4 of Vocab. words used correctly |
|
4. Spelling |
¼ of Vocab.
words spelled correctly |
2/4 of Vocab. words spelled correctly |
¾ of Vocab.
words spelled correctly |
4/4 of Vocab. words spelled correctly |
Explanation:
1. Analysis
– Shows the Òbreaking down,Ó
detailed use of a word
2. Fluency
– Shows the proper, Òdialectically
correctÓ use of a word
3. Vocabulary
Development
– Displaying a level of mastery of Òvoc. wordsÓ not previously attained
4. Spelling – Shows the ÒcorrectÓ marking of every phoneme (individual
sound) of a word
*Learning objectives
taken from the State of California Learning Standards (www.lausd.net)
©
2006 Richard P. Parks
Students apply their knowledge of
word origins to determine the meaning of new words encountered in reading
materials and use those words accurately.
Vocabulary and Concept
Development
1.1 Trace the etymology of significant terms used in political science and
history.
1.2 Apply knowledge of Greek, Latin, and Anglo-Saxon roots and affixes to draw
inferences concerning the meaning of scientific and mathematical terminology.
1.3 Discern the meaning of analogies encountered, analyzing specific
comparisons as well as relationships and inferences.
Comprehension
and Analysis of Grade-Level-Appropriate Text
2.0
Reading Comprehension (Focus on Informational Materials)
2.4 Make warranted and reasonable
assertions about the author's arguments by using elements of the text to defend
and clarify interpretations.
2.5 Analyze an author's implicit and explicit philosophical assumptions and
beliefs about a subject.
Expository Critique
:2.6 Critique the power, validity,
and truthfulness of arguments set forth in public documents; their appeal to
both friendly and hostile audiences; and the extent to which the arguments
anticipate and address reader concerns and counterclaims ( e.g., appeal to
reason, to authority, to pathos and emotion).
Rubric:
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
1. Thesis |
|
Clearly shown with
some mastery of grammar |
Clearly shown with
good mastery of grammar |
Clearly shown with
zero mistakes in grammar |
|
2. Supporting Ideas |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
|
3. Body |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
|
4. Conclusion |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
Ò |
Explanation:
1. Thesis – Main idea/Topic displayed within a sentence
2. Supporting Ideas – Three ideas/subtopics directly linked to the
main idea/topic displayed in a sentence
3. Body – Parts/individual paragraphs that explain the
supporting ideas/subtopics
4. Conclusion – A part/paragraph that is converse of the
Introductory paragraph and sums up the writing
The standards for written and oral English language
conventions have been placed between those for writing and for listening and
speaking because these conventions are essential to both sets of skills.
Students write and speak with a command of standard
English conventions.
3. Demonstrate control
of grammar, diction, and paragraph and sentence structure and an understanding
of English usage.
1.2 Produce legible work that shows accurate spelling and correct punctuation
and capitalization.
1.3 Reflect appropriate manuscript requirements in writing.
2.0 Speaking
Applications (Genres and Their Characteristics)
Students deliver polished formal and extemporaneous
presentations that combine traditional rhetorical strategies of narration,
exposition, persuasion, and description. Student speaking demonstrates a
command of standard American English and the organizational and delivery
strategies outlined in Listening and Speaking Standard 1.0.
Using the speaking strategies of grades eleven and
twelve outlined in Listening and Speaking Standard, students:
2.1 Deliver reflective presentations:
a. Explore the significance of personal experiences, events, conditions, or
concerns, using appropriate rhetorical strategies (e.g., narration,
description, exposition, persuasion).
b. Draw comparisons between the specific incident and broader themes that
illustrate the speaker's beliefs or generalizations about life.
c. Maintain a balance between describing the incident and relating it to more
general, abstract ideas.
IV. Means:
1. Journal Writing (Reflection)
2. Apriori cross-cultural analysis of internal and
external oppression
3.
Vocabulary analysis
("Pre-made" list and words fielded via discussion)
4.
"Off the
Wall" learning activity (Use of gallery photos to support and enhance
ideas developed within the round table discussion; and to formulate more
discussion)
5.
Role play exercise
(Students given skits on which to act out)
6.
Expository writing
exercise (1 page to be written and self edited)
V. Outcome
– Students will have:
¤Prepared
to serve as Citizen Diplomats (Docents) to adults who later view the exhibit
¤Developed a journal relative to each activity they
experienced re what students knew before the show, what was learned, what they
wish to know/explore in the future
¤Written
individual expository essays re roundtable discussion/the theme
¤Interpersonally
developed a newsletter
¤Gained
insight into internal and external oppression and what they can do to
accentuate the positive re their and other persons' feelings about it
¤Displayed
a proficient working understanding of each general and specific learning objective
© 2006 Richard P.
Parks
VI.
Exegesis of Means:
1.
Journal Writing
(Reflection)
á
10 minutes of journal/
personal reflective writing after every activity
2. Apriori cross-cultural analysis of internal and
external oppression
á Stanford/Coronel Notes
á Group discussion (Internal and External Oppression)
3.
Vocabulary analysis
("Pre-made" list and words fielded via discussion to be used for
expository writing):
|
1. Analysis |
11. Synagogues |
21. |
|
2. Fluency |
12. World War II |
22. |
|
3. Vocabulary |
13. Community |
23. |
|
4. Development |
14. Order |
24. |
|
5. Displaying |
15. Chronology |
25. |
|
6. Mastery |
16. Jewry |
26. |
|
7.
Phoneme |
17. Warsaw |
27. |
|
8. Individual |
18. Transformed |
28. |
|
9. Bialstok |
19. Communist |
29. |
|
10. Jewish |
20. Holocaust |
30. |
4.
"Off the Wall" learning activity (Use of
gallery photos to support and enhance ideas developed within the round table
discussion; and to formulate more discussion)
á
Citizen Diplomat
(Docent) exercise
5.
Role play exercise
(Students given skits on which to act out)
á
Students given 10
– 15 minutes to develop a 15 – 30 second skit re internal and/or
external oppression; after the educator gives verbal and visual examples:
A.
Sitting in a knotted,
depressed manner
B.
Hyperbole re rules put
on students, children, adults, etc. Ex: One half of class will get soda, the
other nothing.
6.
Expository writing
exercise (1 page to be written and self edited)
á
Prewriting and Writing
Formula
© 2006 Richard P. Parks